Google’s Material Design philosophy has been making waves in the design world and has now unified all interfaces used by Google. Including all of their websites and the apps they have available within the Android space.
The opportunity for developers to incorporate this Material Design philosophy into their own arsenal for front end development is now here. Google’e released the official framework for front end implementation of Material Design called Material Design Lite.
This course will take you through all the ins and outs of this framework. Including all Material Elements and Layouts as well as explaining some of the design and semantic coding considerations behind these elements.
If you are interested in responsive material layouts for the websites you build, then you should certainly learn the Material Design Lite framework, and what better time to start than right NOW?
Instructor Details
Courses : 1
Specification: Learn to make websites with Google’s Material Design Lite
|
15 reviews for Learn to make websites with Google’s Material Design Lite
Add a review Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Price | $13.99 |
---|---|
Provider | |
Duration | 5.5 hours |
Year | 2015 |
Level | All |
Language | English |
Certificate | Yes |
Quizzes | Yes |
$19.99 $13.99
Thomas S dring –
Instructor is easy to listen to. Good teacher. The course is more a walk through of mdl and it’s done in a nice way. Exactly what I needed to get a little further knowledge.
Mark Prouty –
This course is somewhat piecemeal. The instructor uses CodePen to explain components piece by piece without ever putting anything all together. Some broken links in the resources that should start with https start with http instead. Some questions are not answered. Code and css in a lecture on cards did not match the downloaded files causing confusion for lack of explanation.
Maria Kochetygova –
It was okay, what is missing is a real world project
Paul Whiteside –
Good to understand the design concepts beyond just html and css code
Brian Beardmore –
no hands on development
Al Bedo –
Left ambivalent about whether MDL is the right tool for me. It seems verbose and difficult for a non expert to customise. I suspect many users will want to know how to control custom layouts rather than to use the defaults, yet this aspect is barely covered. Layouts and how to modify them should have been covered before launching into an exhaustive listing of components and their properties, a lot of which is reasonably obvious and repetitive. All the codepen examples are on too dark a background and in too small a font size, making it tricky to follow easily.
Vincent Stack –
I like the course. I need to use MDL in a project and this was a great over view.
Yvonne Dreptate –
Well spoken & great material so far.
Prajwal Belagatti –
Really loved this course. Being an experienced front end developer it wasn’t challenging but highly informative. The components, layout and grid sections give you a lot of confidence to use MDL in your real world projects. I’m happy I know the underlying css classes for writing components that adhere to Material Design guidelines. I’ll be using this in my MEAN stack applications and not just rely on Angular Material and that is fantastic. I’d like to thank the instructor, Adrian, for this awesome course and would highly recommend it for UI Developers looking to add MDL into their skill set. Bootstrap was really getting monotonous and MDL is a breath of fresh air!
Bjorn Vermeulen –
If you don’t want to fall a sleep you have to set the speeds at 1.25 and even then the instructor speaks to slow.
Grzegorz Sarzy ski –
I cannot recommend the course. It is just video version of official documentation. It lacks real life examples. In Real projects you will run into lots of problems (e.g. with layout or form validation). I don’t think that the author did a single project with this framework.
Ron Ashworth –
This is a good introductory course on Material Design for me.
Martin Ba ura –
A clear explanation of all things, it was easy to understand.
Yehor Kashperskyi –
I expected more exploring on forms, composing input elements together, etc.
Scot Murray –
Thank god for 2x speed