Frank Gielen
This course will teach you how to design futureproof systems that meet the requirements of IoT systems: systems that are secure, interoperable, modifiable and scalable. Moreover, you’ll learn to apply best–in–class software architecture methods to help you design complex IoT and other applications. Lastly, you’ll come to understand the business impact of the technical decisions that you make as an IoT system architect. You’ll learn all about software architecture in the next 5 weeks! In the first week, you’ll discover why having a well–designed architecture is important and which challenges you might come across while developing your architecture. By the end of the second week, you’ll already be able to write your own requirements! In the third and fourth week, you will learn how to correctly write quality attributes and quality attribute scenarios for a specific case. In the last week, you’ll learn to describe your own patterns and tactics and see how they’re used in an Android framework.
Instructor Details
Courses : 1
Specification: Software Architecture for the Internet of Things
|
41 reviews for Software Architecture for the Internet of Things
Add a review
| Price | Free |
|---|---|
| Provider | |
| Duration | 15 hours |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| Certificate | Yes |
| Quizzes | Yes |
FREE
Freek W –
For someone who’s been a senior software engineer for a bunch of years, the topics on design patterns and tactics could have dug a bit deeper.
Leandro E B –
The course presents lots of concepts and papers, but it doesn’t really seems applicable in reality. It felt too “fluffy” and subjective to me.
Ahmad S –
Good, but not so deeply good
Khanh N –
The course is almost focus on the SA for traditional software , not too much example, theories and miss some important core components of IoT architecture and especially is security that is also most important quality attribute for IoT project
Jose C C –
The course covers a wide range of aspects about Software Architecture, even beyond the scope of IoT. The peer review assignments help to put into practice some of the concepts, which may seem to be quite abstract at first glance. An improvement suggestion would be to provide more exercises to work on the case study presented in the last units, in order to take advantage of the additional material provided.
Jersey B –
Excellent course as an introduction and overview of generic software architecture concepts. It would be great to get more in depth information about IOT specific patterns and technologies from the architecture trade off perspective.
Mohamed A –
I didn’t learn a lot from this course. It didn’t explain technical IT architectures of IoT.
Carlos P –
I do not remember having been in a course where concepts were so easily applicable. In addition, it clarified me so many technical questions about the techniques I used in my day to day and helped me to define a new approach to my career, now focusing to the Internet of things
Chathura R D S –
In terms of Theory for General Software Architecture this Course is a good refresher for a person who is working with Software Architecture already. The Course could have more focused on IoT specific scenarios compared to Generic Software Architecture. What i recommend is to change the course title and have a separate one for IoT specific matters. If the presenters can provide more practical examples that will help remember how and where we can apply these scenarios. Overall this course content is good and interesting to watch.
naveen t –
Good : It is a very concise course with each week session providing references to books for learning more in depth. Overall I am very satisfied and glad to take this course. Improvements: A lot of information squeezed into short videos. Students would benefit more if there are a bit more videos covering all topics in depth not just refer them to chapters in a book. Some questions are little bit ambiguous. I think reading the book along with this course is very important to understand clearly and apply it at work.
Raghvendra –
It’s not on architecture for IoT as name suggests. It’s general software architecture course.
olgakl77 –
Nice course. Good points discussed.
Dana S –
This course provided me with a a set of takeaway tools that I can leverage on projects for attribute driven design. The focus on methodology, design, peer review, and patterns and tactics would benefit any architect that may be interested in this design approach.
Roshini S –
Good course
Rinaldo F –
Very good course and material. Can be downloaded and read again .
Mohammed S I –
For someone like me who is new to Software Architecture, this course gave some basic understanding. I expected the concepts to be explained more effectively. I hardly understood the DYAMAND example given at the end of the course.
Faiz A –
Good course to get the fundamental and simple case study for easy understanding.
Zahi K –
Very high level with no specific details except for one use case
Karthik –
A very designed course
aditi j –
Good Course , however can have more information on architecture
OLIVRIN G –
A solid course which brings methods and examples to qualify and quantify requirements and their attributes. Modifiability and interoperability for instance are applied to IoT. Tradeoffs and techniques in architecture design and evolution are well explained. Good background reading material. Homework is quite difficult to understand and do.
Nich –
Good course
Felipe C –
Good overall course on software architecure with an emphasys on ADD and a little about IoT. Would like to have dug a little deeper and maybe have some more practical exercises.
Jeffery –
This lesson is a very good guideline of Quality Attribute Driven Software Architecture design.
Johanna K –
The course gives a nice glimpse on how systems can be planned and documented. I liked the questions between videos, because they highlighted the important points and helped me understand the topic better. Videos were high quality. I liked that the important points were shown as text in videos at the same time as the professor or instructor talked about the topic. That gave me both visual and auditory stimulus and thus helped me learn the topic more efficiently. The quizzes asked about important things and gave really good feedback for both correct and incorrect answers. The reading tasks were otherwise correctly timed, but reading the ADD paper took me more like 2 3 hours than promised 20 minutes. As said, the course gave a nice glimpse to one type of planning and documenting the system, so it feels bit exaggerating to promise the students to become software architects after the course. But this is one step forward that goal, thank you for this course!
Min K H –
I learned a lot through this course and was able to apply some of my learnings to my current work. Definitely would like to recommend this course!
Defeng H –
it’s easy to understand and the tool and method are helpful in real projects.
Mehdi E a –
It provides the essential ground to start the IoT software architecture journey
Sumit K –
Nicely designed course and covers a lot in short period.
Sudarshan B –
It is a great course to start with Internet of Things when you know the hardware level already. At first, Software Architecture was thought in general, and then it was linked to the Internet of Things scenarios. The takeaway for this course is good. Also, the course is nicely designed. Thank you.
armin m –
This course is a shame. I can not imagine than anybody of the team who created this course is aware of the current situation. None of the materials for week 4 and week 5 is available online. The course videos are extremely boring and the slides displayed in the videos are small, blurred and unreadable. They are also not downloadable from anywhere. There are obviously only a handful participants. Much too less to have a peer graded assignment working.
Christian L –
Quite interesting from the IoT course I did in 2016 on EDX: ColumbiaX DS101x 103x
Roosvelt S O –
Pros: The content is relevant, you receive valuable and extense info properly summarize. Cons: lack of participants for reviewing the multiple assigments.
Oleksandra –
Awful English, is this a joke? No emotions, the lector just reads the text from the screen behind.
Mikhail K –
Too much theory and very little practice.
chandrakanth p –
good
Viswanatha R A –
VERY GOOD
Tene K T D –
detailed presentation
Rasika R D –
IT IS GOOD COURSE . I RECOMMEND IT TO EVERYONE .
BATTU N –
Essay to Complete the course
Thamatam C –
I learned many things from this Course